Post by jabinkhatun907 on Jan 12, 2024 22:23:59 GMT -6
It would be too simplistic to blame this position on a simple contradiction between morality and self-interest. Urging an end to the war was primarily motivated by moral reasons. The duration of the war affected how people in different countries viewed the event. The longer the war lasts, the greater the perception of the explosive violence that characterizes modern warfare. This shapes the way we view the relationship between war and peace. I am interested in these points given that Germany is slowly beginning to discuss the implications and possibilities of peace negotiations. The two perspectives through which we view and evaluate the war began with two models of war goals.
It finds expression in the debate over vague but competing idiomatic formulations of whether Ukraine will lose our arms supply goal of war or is directed toward victory over Russia. This conceptually unclear difference has little to do in principle with support for or against pacifism. Although Philippines WhatsApp Number Data the pacifist movements that emerged at the end of the century politicized the violent dimensions of war the real issue here was not the gradual overcoming of war as a means of resolving international conflicts but the refusal to take up arms. . In this sense pacifism plays no role in either view, which differs according to the weight of war victims. This one.
The point is important because the rhetorical nuances between not losing and winning in war do not yet distinguish pacifists from non-pacifists. Today this nuance also reflects the contradictions within political camps who believe that the Western alliance not only has the right but also the political obligation to provide Ukraine with weapons, logistical support and civilian services to bravely combat criminal attacks in Ukraine. Violating international law and infringing upon the existence and independence of a sovereign state. This stance was related to a sense of affinity in the face of suffering for a people who did not gain independence until the collapse of the Soviet Union after centuries of rule from foreign countries, Poland, Russia and Austria.
It finds expression in the debate over vague but competing idiomatic formulations of whether Ukraine will lose our arms supply goal of war or is directed toward victory over Russia. This conceptually unclear difference has little to do in principle with support for or against pacifism. Although Philippines WhatsApp Number Data the pacifist movements that emerged at the end of the century politicized the violent dimensions of war the real issue here was not the gradual overcoming of war as a means of resolving international conflicts but the refusal to take up arms. . In this sense pacifism plays no role in either view, which differs according to the weight of war victims. This one.
The point is important because the rhetorical nuances between not losing and winning in war do not yet distinguish pacifists from non-pacifists. Today this nuance also reflects the contradictions within political camps who believe that the Western alliance not only has the right but also the political obligation to provide Ukraine with weapons, logistical support and civilian services to bravely combat criminal attacks in Ukraine. Violating international law and infringing upon the existence and independence of a sovereign state. This stance was related to a sense of affinity in the face of suffering for a people who did not gain independence until the collapse of the Soviet Union after centuries of rule from foreign countries, Poland, Russia and Austria.